President Donald Trump’s U.S. Supreme Court nominee Amy Coney Barrett in 2006 signed an ad in a newspaper in Indiana calling for a landmark 1973 ruling on legalizing abortion nationwide to be overturned, a policy certain to be scrutinized during upcoming Senate confirmation hearings. Yours. Barrett Supreme Court 2020 Vintage Notorious ACB Amy Coney T-Shirt
Barrett Supreme Court 2020 Vintage Notorious ACB Amy Coney T-Shirt, hoodie, tank top, sweater
Her involvement in the ad published in the Barrett Supreme Court 2020 Vintage Notorious ACB Amy Coney T-Shirt South Bend Tribune, first reported by the Guardian newspaper on Thursday, appears to be the most direct expression of Barrett’s opposition to abortion and will undoubtedly intensify the debate that she will vote limited , if not overturned, abortion rights if she is confirmed to the Supreme Court.
Trump, who in January addressed an anti-abortion rally in Washington and said, “Un newborns have never had a stronger guard in the White House,” promised in the 2016 presidential race to appoint Supreme Court justices who would overturn the Roe vs Wade ruling. , which has made abortion legal throughout the United States.
Trump has called on the Senate to confirm Barrett to replace the Barrett Supreme Court 2020 Vintage Notorious ACB Amy Coney T-Shirt late Liberal Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg, an abortion rights defender, before the presidential election on November 3.
During Tuesday’s presidential debate, Trump protested when his Democratic challenger Joe Biden said the fate of Roe vs. Wade was “on the ballot” in the election.
“You don’t know her views on Roe vs. Wade,” Trump told Biden.
A Catholic who has a law degree and teaches at the University of Notre Dame, a Catholic facility in South Bend, Barrett is a favorite of religious conservatives. She was a law professor at Notre Dame at the time of the ad.
Overturning the ruling has been a long-term goal of religious conservatives in America. The ruling recognizes that the constitutional right to personal privacy protects women’s ability to have abortions.
The court in 1992 reaffirmed the ruling and that prohibition laws place an “excessive burden” on abortion. Conservatives who opposed the ruling argued that the case had been wrongly decided.